Judy Middleton 2003 (revised 2019)
The scheme for a motor racing
track on the Downs at Portslade was first mooted in 1926 when
Brighton Corporation endeavoured to lease land for that purpose. It
would of course have affected Mile Oak Farm, but they owned that
already.
The above text is a copy of an article that appeared in Motor Sport (magazine) in January 1927 |
Both
schemes were dropped, but revived again the following year. The
matter was considered to be of such importance as to be mentioned in
The Times (27
July 1928). Apparently, Brighton Council proposed to build not just a
motor racing track, but an aerodrome as well.
It is pleasant to record that even
in those days there were people keen to preserve the beauty of the
Downs for future generations. In this case it was the Society of
Sussex Downsmen who resisted Brighton’s grandiose scheme, and the
powerful Alderman Carden was very annoyed at their opposition. He
grumbled that really it was going too far. Alderman Carden could not
understand the lack of enthusiasm for the scheme because as he noted
‘Brooklands is a flat track while this winds in and out and up and
down with hairpin bends.’ The scheme would require capital of
£175,000 of which at least £80,000 would be spent locally on the
construction of the track. It was hoped that the track would be open
by the following Easter. An amendment to refer the scheme back was
defeated by 40 votes to sixteen.
Meanwhile, Portslade Council had
gone ahead with its Town Planning Scheme, which had been started
before there was any suggestion of a motor racing track. This meant
that the promoters had to apply to Portslade Council for an Interim
Development Order before they could proceed. Once again, all the
plans came to nothing.
In 1933 the Society of Sussex
Downsmen were horrified to learn that plans for a motor racing track
had been revived. It seems that, fearing opposition, the matter had
been kept quiet. By the time the Society had got wind of what was
going on, and written their objections to Brighton Council,
negotiations had been in progress for some time already. These
negotiations were with the Waterworks Committee in order to secure a
42-year lease on some 1,000 acres of Downland, of which 450 acres
would be enclosed for a track and buildings. In addition there would
be a continuous 6-ft high fence, some three miles in length – the
greater part to consist of close-mesh wire but a mile of it would be
solid oak fencing. About two miles of fence would run alongside
existing rights of way across two spurs of the Downs – along Mount
Zion and Benfield Hill.
copyright © D. Sharp (schematic drawing by D. Sharp) |
The Dyke Hotel would be north of the track, and Foredown Isolation Hospital at the south end. There would be a grandstand, and if a small clubhouse were to be erected, the roof was to be of rustic tiles, or thatched. The racing track was regarded as a potential asset, increasing the rateable value of the land as well as providing local employment. Sir Harry Preston was a whole-hearted supporter of the scheme.
The
Sussex Daily News
(27
October 1933) commented that the ‘beautiful hill known as Cock
Roost’ did not come into the area the promoters contemplated
acquiring. The newspaper also stated that ‘any desecration of the
Downs has been done already’ by the installation of electricity
pylons. The pylons are still a sore point to this day. Every so often
there is talk about burying the vital cables instead but since the
costs would be prohibitive, this solution is unlikely to take place
any time soon.
In January 1934 there was a
meeting of Portslade ratepayers when Mr L. A. Blackbourne, solicitor
to the Motor Track Company, explained their proposals.
In February 1934 there was a
public meeting held at Portslade at which a resolution was made to be
passed on to Portslade Council. The resolution stated ‘that the
proposed Motor Racing Track is detrimental to the general interests
of the district and they request their representatives … to use
every possible endeavour to prevent the construction of the Track.’
Albert Broomfield farmed land in
Mile Oak and was also a Tory councillor on Portslade Council. Mr
Broomfield was in favour of the racing track because he thought it
would bring in all sorts of business to the area. But people who
lived in the Benfield area were horrified at the prospect of a racing
track, and told Mr Broomfield that if he continued to support the
scheme, they would no longer vote for him. From then on Mr Broomfield
was obliged to stand as an independent councillor.
On 2 March 1934 the General
Purposes Committee of Portslade Council received a combined
deputation from the promoters and Brighton Council.
On 6 March 1934 an extraordinary
meeting of Portslade Council was held at which it was proposed that
the application for interim permission to develop the motor racing
track should not be granted. Nine councillors – including Andrew Melville, and Harry Parker – voted in favour of turning the scheme
down. In fact there were only three Portslade councillors who were in
favour of the track – they were A. J. Broomfield, A. Packham, and
W. E. Phillips.
copyright © J. Middleton In the plans of the Brighton & Hove Racing Club Ltd a two lane highway would have brought thousands of spectators close by the Foredown Isolation Hospital, which was purposely built in 1884 in this remote location, to quarantine infectious diseases. (The photograph shows Foredown Water Tower, the only building to survive the demolition of the hospital complex in 1989) |
However, the matter went before
Parliament, and the House of Lords gave their approval for the
construction of a motor racing track, providing suitable restrictions
were enforced.
The Society of Sussex Downsmen
battled on, but it seemed their cause was hopeless. In January 1935
an agreement was signed between the promoters of the track –
Brighton Road Racing Company – and Brighton & Hove Motor Club,
which had 260 members.
In March 1935 the secretary of the
company wrote to Shoreham Labour Exchange to inform them that 200 men
would be required to start work in around three weeks time. This news
must have caused something of a rumpus among the working men of
Portslade because a short while afterwards it was stated that
Portslade men would be given preference.
The
Sussex Daily News
(30
March 1935) reported that work had started on the track, and the
contractors were Melville, Dunstan & Whitson. What then happened
is something of a mystery, although it seems certain the track was
never completed, but presumably a short stretch might have been laid
out.
copyright © D. Sharp ‘This is the beautiful stretch of countryside that the Society of Sussex Downsmen and Portslade Council
fought to preserve from development.’
|
It is ironic in remembering the
fight to save the Downs from development in the 1930s that only four
years later the country was at war with Germany. The Government had
no qualms in taking over the Downs at a time of grave national need.
The Downs came under the control of the military, and were used as an
Army training ground. Ordinary folk found their freedom to roam the
Downs was abruptly curtailed, and since live ammunition was in use,
it was a necessary precaution. It is interesting to note that these
restrictions did not end with the declaration of peace but persisted
until the 1950s. Even when ordinary people were once more able to
walk upon the Downs, they were strongly advised to keep to footpaths.
At Mile Oak Farm, the bomb disposal squad were frequent visitors
because when ploughing got under way again, bombs or live ammunition
would sometimes turn up.
Sources
Middleton J, Encyclopaedia of Hove and
Portslade
Motor Sport (magazine) January 1927
Royal Pavilion & Museums, Brighton & Hove
Motor Sport (magazine) January 1927
Royal Pavilion & Museums, Brighton & Hove
Sussex
Daily News (27
October 1933 / 30 March 1935)
The
Times (27
July 1928)
The Keep
DO/A35/27 – Portslade Urban
District Council Minutes 1932-1933
DO/A35/28 – Portslade Urban
District Council Minutes 1933
DO/A35/29 – Portslade Urban
District Council Minutes 1934
DO/A35/30 – Portslade Urban
District Council Minutes 1934
DO/A35/31 – Portslade Urban
District Council Minutes 1934-1935
Copyright © J.Middleton 2019
page layout and additional research by D. Sharp.
page layout and additional research by D. Sharp.